In the situation where R2 maliciously runs over F5 after R3 touches home, what is the ruling?

In this situation, R2 maliciously running over F5 demonstrates unsportsmanlike conduct and a clear intent to impede the defensive player. This kind of action is regarded as interference and is taken seriously as it risks the safety of players. By calling R2 out and ejecting him, the governing rules aim to maintain sportsmanship and player safety within the game.

The ruling reinforces the idea that aggressive behavior aimed at harming or intimidating an opponent is unacceptable in the context of the sport, and there are strict consequences, including ejection. This serves as a deterrent to similar behavior in the future, promoting fair play and respect among players.

While the other options may consider the results of R3's run or the role of F5's actions, they do not address the primary issue of R2's aggressive conduct, reinforcing that malicious intent in the sport warrants strict repercussions.