If R2 interferes with a batted ball, what is the consequence?

When R2 interferes with a batted ball, the ruling is that R2 is declared out for interference. Interference occurs when a player's actions disrupt the play, and in this case, R2's interference with the batted ball creates a scenario that directly affects the outcome of the play.

This ruling serves multiple purposes: it enforces the principle that players must avoid impeding the progress of the game and maintains the integrity of the play by ensuring that the defense has a fair opportunity to make a play on the ball. Declaring R2 out discourages interference with batted balls and reinforces the rules governing player conduct on the field.

In contrast, the other choices suggest alternative consequences that do not align with the established rules regarding interference. For instance, saying that R2 is safe but B3 is out overlooks the critical factor that R2's action has interfered with the game, which warrants their declaration as out. The notion that the run scores immediately fails to take into account the implications of interference, which could nullify the run depending on the situation. Stating the ball remains in play would inaccurately represent the consequence of interference, as the action disrupts the normal flow of the game.